|
China's LEO Constellation Ambitions
Mar 6th, 2018 by
Jose Del Rosario, NSR
In late-February 2018, the China Aerospace Science and Technology
Corporation (CASC) announced plans
to build a constellation of 300 small satellites in LEO for global
communications and other services. The Hongyan (translated as “wild
goose”) constellation, which is targeted to be operational by 2021, was
originally designed for 60 satellites. The current plan expands to 300
satellites reportedly due in part to a deal with Thailand Kasetsart
University and the China Great Wall Industry Corp, a CASC subsidiary.
What is or Will be Hongyan’s Impact on the Satellite industry?
The most visible or at least, the most talked about LEO contenders stem
from the U.S. and Canada, numbering at least 11 with planned satellites
to be deployed at around 18,000. Hongyan’s 300 satellites certainly pale
in comparison to programs that include SpaceX, Boeing and OneWeb that
have filed with the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC),
largely targeting broadband access services in efforts to bridge the
Digital Divide.
In terms of market access, the “FCC Players,” as depicted in the graph
above, will likely position the U.S. as an anchor market, and the
Rest-of-the-World could be regarded as secondary targets. Developing
regions are always considered given the need for connectivity; however,
the business case still needs to be closed as market dynamics do not
support a U.S. or Western-style approach. For instance, ARPU levels in
the U.S. cannot be applied to Africa given the macroeconomic conditions
of many countries. Yes, the A and B socio-economic groups can be
targeted and are the low-hanging fruits, but to truly support an ROI
model that reaches the masses, ARPU levels in Africa (and other
low-income populations around the globe) must decline to very low levels
to make the service affordable. And let’s not forget equipment
costs, which are also a prohibitive expense that must be included in the
equation.
In Comes China
The “FCC Players” primary markets will likely not be threatened by
Hongyan as it will likely not gain market access in the U.S. and Canada.
In fact, Hongyan is not looking to provision services or compete in the
U.S. and Canada anyway. Instead, China is looking at Eurasia via the
“One Belt One Road” (OBOR) initiative as well as African and Latin
American countries as part of its soft power projection and overall
thrust of gaining economic, political and security ties with an ever
expanding number of countries that are willing to be part of its sphere
of influence. So, the question is, can China’s Hongyan
constellation change the market dynamics such that low ARPU can be
achieved as well as equipment costs be made affordable? We don’t
know as China has not released many details of its satellite programs
and its go-to-market strategy. But what we do know is that China has
made deals in Nigeria and Bolivia (and will likely make other deals
outside the OBOR footprint) where financial arrangements have made
procurement, launch and satellite service provisioning possible.
And
here is where the threat lies
for the “FCC Players.”
Hongyan will not apply U.S. or Western-style
market penetration strategies but follow or create a new market dynamic
where pure market forces will not be applied. In a sense, China
will change or un-level the playing field.
These can or will include financing packages that minimize risks to
their “clients” that will favor Hongyan over offerings made by the “FCC
Players” based on traditional or Western-style ROI strategies in Eurasia
and other low income countries across the globe.
Bottom Line
China’s space program and satellite communications
initiatives, including the deployment of Hongyan, are not based on
Western-style market economics. In fact, it can be argued that gaining
positive ROI is not the end goal of China’s space program but primarily
the projection and increase of its power and influence across the globe.
The side effect of this is to potentially
undermine the value proposition of Western players that go by
traditional market rules and strategies,
specifically in the Eurasian, African and Latin American regions as well
as other low-income countries that cannot afford high-speed connections.
Additionally, in NSR’s China Satcom Markets (CSM) report, Chinese
state-owned companies are forecast to manufacture and launch over 800
Gbps of GEO-HTS capacity by 2026, with much of this coming over these
regions.
And as seen from the deal between Thailand Kasetsart University and the
China Great Wall Industry Corp., countries and institutions are willing
to play ball with China to further their goals. In fact, it is highly
likely that another Chinese constellation will enter the market, and/or
Hongyan can be increased further from its current 300 to rival the
largest planned constellations such as SpaceX and Boeing.
The full backing and power of the state in terms of program development,
funding and the sheer persistence in meeting China’s space policy goals
are what companies in the West will contend with in a changing
marketplace.
|
|