Commercial satellite
services seen as essential to military capabilities
The Australian Defence Force sees commercial
satellite services as a key resource to provide
flexibility in its military operations according to
air vice marshal Andrew Dowse, Australian Defence
Force head of ICT operations for national and
regional security. And that experience is also
consistent with overseas defence forces, according
to panellists at the Australasian Satellite Forum.
“Our planning processes don't allow us the
flexibility to call on services at the speed which
we can get them from commercial providers,” Dowse
said, providing the recent example of support
operations for Cyclone Debbie in Queensland.
He said the ADF was able to provide communications
from the WGS military satellite constellation and
from its payload on the Optus C1 satellite, both to
the makeshift headquarters it established and to
Navy ships up the coast. However, this was not
enough for all of its needs.
“Whether it was army teams deploying around the
state or whether it be assistance with remediation
of towns that didn't have any communications, in
that respect we were absolutely reliant upon
commercial services,” he said.
SES Asia Pacific exec James Hopper also told the
forum that an estimated 80-90% of communications at
the height of the Iraq war were supplied over
commercial services. But he said it was also the
capability that commercial providers brought that
was important.
“First you get access to new technology in many
cases much faster than you're going to get through a
typical defence acquisition process. You gain
operational flexibility. There are some concepts
we've worked on and deployed for customers where you
can bring some new tools to bear. For example, you
can use conventional widebeams to support a mission,
or you can use a high-throughput LEO system to
backhaul lots of ISR data,” he suggested.
“It's not necessarily just an augmentation
capability but it gives you a range of tools and a
range of options that you wouldn't get solely by the
use of military systems,” he added.
Meanwhile, Inmarsat COO Jason Smith noted that
cost was not the only consideration in choosing to
use commercial providers. “I don't think anyone has
sufficient funds to do all they would choose to do
on their own even if they could. But regardless of
that I think there's such a benefit for the ability
to disaggregate and add interoperability and so on
that there's actually operational benefits that
flow. It's not just a matter of appropriate funds,”
he said.
Geoff Long, CommsDay - talk Satellite
|