Emergency services
spectrum to get
cost-benefit analysis
The Federal Government
has followed through on
a promise it made before
the last election to
conduct a cost-benefit
analysis of the best way
to deliver a mobile
broadband capability for
public safety agencies.
The CBA will be
conducted by the
Productivity Commission
and will include
consultation with
industry.
The government has
called for a “first
principles” analysis of
the most efficient and
effective way of
delivering broadband by
2020, including the most
cost-effective
combination of private
and public inputs,
services and expertise.
It said that
Commonwealth, State and
Territory governments
all recognised the
potential benefits of an
effective national
public safety mobile
broadband capability for
agencies such as police,
fire and ambulance
services.
The Federal Department
of Communications will
shortly write to its
state and territory
counterparts seeking
their comments on a
draft terms of reference
for the cost-benefit
analysis. The
Productivity Commission
will then consult with
government and
non-government
stakeholders following
the receipt of the terms
of reference.
The issue of mobile
broadband capability for
emergency services
organisations
has been ongoing for a
number of years and the
subject of multiple
reviews. A number of
public safety agencies
have been calling for
20MHz of dedicated
spectrum in either the
700MHz or 800MHz bands.
In 2012, the Australian
Communications and Media
Authority announced that
it would set aside 10MHz
(2 x 5MHz) of spectrum
in 800MHz for public
safety agencies.
However, the
organisations have never
been satisfied with the
ACMA's decision, arguing
that 20MHz was the
minimum that would be
needed for future
broadband use.
The ACMA has previously
responded that its
allocation of 10MHz of
spectrum was based on
work done by the Public
Safety Mobile Broadband
Steering Committee,
which had a membership
drawn from Commonwealth
agencies, including the
ACMA, and numerous peak
bodies representing
PSAs.
“Based on the
recommendations in the
PSMBSC’s reports, the
spectrum provided by the
ACMA was considered
sufficient for all of
the scenarios modelled,
except for the worst
case scenario, which
would not be able to be
served solely by an 800
MHz PSMB network even if
double the amount of
spectrum was provided,”
it said in one
submission at the time.
The move to conduct a
cost-benefit analysis
was welcomed by Police
Federation of Australia
spokesman Mark Burgess
(pictured), who told
CommsDay that it was a
commitment the
government had made to
the organisation. The
PFA has been one of the
most vocal lobbyists on
behalf of emergency
services group
supporting dedicated
spectrum.
Burgess said the PFA
would again be involved
in the process but he
said he was confident
that the CBA would
support the need for
emergency services to
have the full 20MHz of
spectrum, noting that
similar studies overseas
had made the same
recommendations.
He also suggested that
emergency service
organisations needed to
develop a governance
model and a management
group so that they could
coordinate with
potential partners
within the private
sector.
The PFA has also called
for the allocation of
20MHz of spectrum in a
submission to the
government's current
spectrum review, which
is being conducted in
conjunction with the
ACMA. In the submission,
it claimed that without
dedicated spectrum, it
would “put police and
emergency services in a
position of having a
monopoly supplier in a
position to dictate to
them the price, quality,
security and terms of a
capability essential to
their public safety
functions in the 21st
century.”
“The only way to avoid
this is for public
safety to have dedicated
spectrum. The
telecommunications
companies seem to be
advocating, contrary to
the Act, that law
enforcement and
emergency services
should have zero
broadband spectrum,” the
submission noted.
Despite the objections,
law enforcement agencies
currently make use of
Telstra's LTE network
for operations. Its
service is known as
LANES – LTE Advanced
Network for Emergency
Services – and was most
recently used for the
G20 meetings in
Brisbane.
According to Burgess,
the service had worked
well, but he noted that
it probably “had not
been put to the test”
given there were no
major incidents.
However, he said the
coming fire season could
raise issues again.
“It's unfortunate that
it sometimes takes a
disaster to get people's
attention,” Burgess
noted.
Geoff Long,
Commsday
|