|
|
|
|
|
|
GEO and Non-GEO High Throughput
Satellites (HTS) to Propel Satellite Backhaul
April 16, 2015
NSR's newly released Wireless Backhaul via Satellite, 9th
Edition finds a robust market increasingly impacted by the much
deliberated Non-GEO-HTS programs, specifically LEO-HTS presenting both
challenges and opportunities for the industry. A diverse set of
market segments are expected to grow at mixed levels, with current and
next-generation solutions generating healthy revenue streams from $1.7
billion in 2014 to $5.3 billion by 2024.
Various service offerings have and will target all market segments,
posing risks and rewards:
- Traditional FSS capacity in C-band and Ku-band
has been the most prevalent solution used thus far for backhaul and
trunking in land areas and has begun to address the need for 3G
services. It has likewise made a compelling business case for
Mobility Platforms in the Maritime and Aeronautical sectors, serving
the needs of high-paying passengers for the provision of Wi-Fi
services.
- GEO-HTS capacity is making a big push on land,
air and sea where a clear migration in the Fixed Land Towers
backhaul and Trunking markets is underway. Less expensive and
higher throughput capacity is challenging the economics of
Traditional FSS where erosion of the revenue base is leading to an
“HTS play” by operators that own Traditional FSS transponders.
- Finally, Non-GEO-HTS, which is in its infancy,
promises better latency and here, O3b is making inroads in Backhaul,
Trunking and Mobility Platforms. LEO-HTS is still in the planning
stages. Few details on LEO-HTS programs have been released, but if
one or two programs are launched, total capacity will increase
many-fold that at a minimum will lead to price pressure for all
offerings.
The LEO-HTS entrance, especially when backed by heavyweights such as
Google, SpaceX, Qualcomm, Virgin and others, has captured the
imagination of the industry leading to a mixed reaction of excitement on
one hand and a bit of confusion on the other. With so many LEO
satellites and so much capacity proposed, many questions have arisen on
program viability in terms of both launching the systems and gaining
positive ROI if the systems do launch.
In satellite backhaul, the touted game change will come in the form of
cheaper capacity, which LEO-HTS programs can certainly address. “However
non-GEO HTS equipment pricing, specifically antenna systems, will have
to come down dramatically compared to current O3b pricing in order to
address CAPEX considerations," according to the study’s author Jose Del
Rosario, Research Director for NSR. “More importantly, although backhaul
is a large and growing market, other applications will have to be
targeted by LEO-HTS systems as the market opportunity is relatively
limited given that all systems will target this market space. Incumbents
will surely respond to the LEO-HTS threat in terms of lowering their own
pricing such that the LEO-HTS impact until 2024 will likely be limited.”
|
|
|
| |
|