HTS Revenues Easily
Offset Any FSS C/Ku Losses
Dec 4th, 2013
by Patrick
French, NSR
Concern has been raised throughout the satellite
industry that the vast amount of new HTS supply
coming to market, forecasted by NSR to
increase by 1.5 Tbps by 2022,
will swamp existing C- and Ku-band transponder
demand leading to a global drop in C/Ku pricing and
negatively impacting revenues for legacy FSS
services.
NSR does not deny, and in fact readily concurs,
that some existing C- and Ku-band transponder demand
for applications like backhaul, trunking and VSAT
networking will suffer in the coming years due to
the arrival of new HTS systems. And there will as
well be significant transponder price pressure for
certain applications and/or satellites if some
operators try to compete using classic C/Ku
transponders on a pure price basis with the new HTS
capacity.
This being said, NSR also argues based on data
from its Global Assessment of Satellite Supply &
Demand 10th Edition study that,
net-net, the migration to HTS services is
overall
advantageous
to the satellite industry in terms of
real revenue gains
in the coming ten years. The chart below attempts to
make an “apples-to-apples” comparison of NSR’s
forecasted net revenue gains for C- and Ku-band
services – excluding the video distribution and DTH
verticals that are the strongest natural fit for
classic FSS capacity and benefit the least from the
move to HTS – compared to the net wholesale HTS
capacity revenue growth – excluding consumer
broadband access services, which are effectively a
new market segment.
It can be seen that while NSR does forecast a
C-band transponder demand decline and revenue loss
by 2022, the combined C- and Ku-band revenues for
data-focused applications should continue to grow.
This is an illustration of what NSR calls the “bifurcation”
of the overall satellite industry as applications
where issues of coverage and reliability trump pure
price per bit continue to grow in transponder and
revenue terms on C- and Ku-band, while services that
are mainly cost per bit driven move to HTS capacity.
Even if NSR’s assessment of the overall HTS
demand growth turns out to be overly optimistic or
the negative impact on C and Ku-band demand is
underestimated, a rough estimate shows that some
combination of demand and pricing would need to
drop by
nearly 40% more beyond NSR’s current forecast
in the coming ten years such that, on a net basis,
revenue growth from HTS demand could not offset that
lost in the C/Ku-band market. Today, NSR just does
not see this as a likely proposition and feels that
individuals raising concerns about the impact of new
HTS supply are either failing to take the entire
market picture into account or are greatly
overestimating the real negative impact of the new
HTS capacity; just as some in the past misjudged the
negative impact of “new” Ku-band services on C-band
demand or digital video on analog channels.
Bottom Line
Seen from certain
perspectives, there is no doubt the growth of the
HTS market in the coming years will have some
negative impact on classic C- and Ku-band services.
Yet, NSR forecasts that on an industry-wide basis
the net
gain in new HTS revenues
for the applications that most directly compete with
legacy C- and Ku-band will
more than offset any
revenue loss.
In fact, NSR even forecasts a revenue increase in
combined C/Ku-band data services as new markets and
opportunities open up.
It is NSR’s belief that only the most pessimistic
forecast of industry trends in the coming years
would lead to a net loss in overall industry revenue
growth for mainly data-type applications. While some
individual players may feel the impact of HTS more
acutely – both positively and negatively – the
overall market prognosis remains good. NSR is fully
confident of the satellite industry’s ability to
adapt to, and fully profit from, the coming HTS
revolution.